At first I thought I was watching an Air Farce re-run, but it was actually the news!  There was Harper and some side-kicks standing on a small ice flow in the arctic. He had flown to the nearest airport and hopped on a helicopter for a one-minute ride that would have taken three minutes by car according to the news report – but we got to see him in the helicopter, which obviously has much more gravitas than a car. In the background of the shot was an icebreaker. There was a fly-over by three planes, and navy divers climbed into the ice flow from the water below. I wonder what the cost for the icebreaker, planes, divers, and helicopter was.  And the carbon footprint? I don’t want to know.

Posted in Community at August 26th, 2010. No Comments.

Federal Conservatives on the Industry Committee have responded to the list of witnesses that the opposition parties want to call by insisting that “ordinary” Canadians be able to appear as well because it is ordinary Canadians who will be forced to divulge their personal information if the long-form census continues.  The assumption, of course, is that the organizations that are against killing the long-form represent some kind of elites – not ordinary Canadians. 

The logical extension of this is to ensure that no Canadian who is represented by any of the elite organizations be allowed to appear as an “ordinary” Canadian. So, who should we exclude from the list of potential Canadians to ensure that they are not extraordinary by virtue of their being represented by one of the elite protest groups?

It’s a long list. No Anglicans, Catholics, United Church members, or Jews need apply because their national representatives have protested the change. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce is against the policy, so no business people need apply.  The Canadian Labour Congress is against the change, so strike out any unionized workers.  Twenty-two cities have registered their opposition – representing virtually all the major population centres – so their residents are off the list. University students need not apply.  The list goes on…and on…and on. 

  1. Alberta Health Services, CEO Dr. Stephen Duckett
  2. Alberta Professional Planners Institute
  3. Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services
  4. Alliance canadienne des personnes retraitées
  5. Ancestry.ca
  6. Anglican Church of Canada / Église anglicane du Canada
  7. Anne Johnston Health Station
  8. Association des statisticiennes et statisticiens du Québec
  9. Association du Barreau canadien / The Bar Associate of Canada
  10. Association of Canadian Economist / Association canadienne des économistes
  11. Association des Soeurs du Canada
  12. Association canadienne francaise pour avancement de science (ACFAS)
  13. Association féminine d’éducation et d’action sociale (AFEAS)
  14. Association francophone pour le savoir (Acfas)
  15. Association of Canadian Archivists (ACA)
  16. Association of Canadian Map Libraries and Archives (ACMLA) / Association des cartothèques et des archives cartographiques du Canada
  17. Association of Educational Researchers of Ontario
  18. Association of Municipalities of Ontario / Association des municipalités de l’Ontario
  19. Association ontarienne des chercheurs et chercheuses en éducation au ministre Clement (AERO)
  20. Association of Ontario Health Centres
  21. Association of Public Health Epidemiologists in Ontario (APHEO) / Association ontarienne d’épidémiologie et desanté publique
  22. Atlantic Provinces Economics Council / Conseil économique de province de l’atlantique
  23. BC Library Association
  24. BC Chamber of Commerce
  25. BC Government Employee Union (BCGEU)
  26. Black Creek Community Health Centre
  27. BC Non Profit Housing Association
  28. BC Government and Service Employees’ Union
  29. Bloc Québécois
  30. Burlington Chamber of Commerce
  31. Burnaby Family Life
  32. C.D. Howe Institute
  33. Caledon Institute of Social Policy / Institut Caledon des Politiques Sociales
  34. Calgary Herald (Editorial)
  35. Calgary and Red Deer City Planners
  36. Canada Census Committee
  37. Canadian Association of Professional Employees
  38. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) / Centre canadien pour des politiques alternatives
  39. Canada West Foundation
  40. Canada Without Poverty Advocacy Network
  41. Canadian Alliance of Student Associations (CASA) / Alliance canadienne des étudiants (CASA)
  42. Canadian Anthropology Society / Société canadienne d’anthropologie (CASCA)
  43. Canadian Association for Business Economics (CABE) / Association canadienne des économistes d’affaire
  44. Canadian Association of Geographers / Association canadienne des géographes
  45. Canadian Association of Journalists / Association canadienne de journalisme
  46. Canadian Association of Midwifes (CAM)
  47. Canadian Association of Public Data Users (CAPDU) / Association canadienne des usagers de données publiques
  48. Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL) / Association canadienne des librairies de recherche
  49. Canadian Association of Retired People (CARP)
  50. Canadian Association of Social Workers (CASW)
  51. Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) / Association canadienne des professeurs d’université
  52. Canadian Chamber of Commerce
  53. Canadian Conference of the Arts
  54. Canadian Council on Social Development / Conseil canadien du développement social
  55. Canadian Catholic Council of Bishops
  56. Canadian Economics Association
  57. Canadian Evaluation Society / Association canadienne d’évaluation
  58. Canadian Federation of Demographers / Association canadienne des démographes
  59. Canadian Federation of Humanities and Social Sciences / Fédération canadienne des sciences humaines et sociales
  60. Canadian Federation of Independent Business / Fédération canadienne des entreprises indépendante
  61. Canadian Federation of Students
  62. Canadian Restaurant and Food Services Association
  63. Canadian Historical Association / Société historique du Canada
  64. Canadian Housing and Renewal Association
  65. Canadian Institute of Actuaries / l’Association canadienne des actuaires
  66. Canadian Institute of Transportation Engineers
  67. Canadian Institute of Planners / Fédération canadienne des urbanistes
  68. Canadian Index of Wellbeing
  69. Canadian Jewish Congress / Congrès Juif Canadien
  70. Canadian Labour Congress / Congrès canadien des travailleurs
  71. Canadian Library Association
  72. Canadian Marketing Association / Association canadienne de marketing
  73. Canadian Medical Association Journal
  74. Canadian Medical Association
  75. Canadian Mental Health Association
  76. Canadian Network of Metropolis Centers / Réseau canadien des centres Metropolis
  77. Canadian Nurses Association / Société des infirmières du Canada
  78. Canadian Population Society / Association canadienne de population
  79. Canadian Public Health Association / Association canadienne de santé publique
  80. Canadian Research Data Network Centre / Réseau des centres de données de recherche
  81. Canadian Society for Epidemiology and Biostatistics (CSEB) / Société canadienne d’épidémiologie et de statistiques
  82. Canadian Sociology Association / Association canadienne de Sociologie
  83. Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) / Syndicat Canadien de Fonction Publique (SCFP)
  84. Canadian Urban Institute / Association canadienne de développement urbain
  85. Canadian Women’s Foundation
  86. Capital Regional District (in B.C.)
  87. Mel Cappe, former Clerk of the Privy Council
  88. Carleton University Graduate Student Association (GSA)
  89. Carleton University Undergraduate Student Association (CUSA)
  90. Carleton University Academic Staff Association (CUASA)
  91. Central Toronto Community Health Centres
  92. Centre francophone de Toronto
  93. Centre for Study of Living Standards / Centre de recherche pour niveau de vie
  94. Centre interuniversitaire québécois des statistiques sociales / CIQSS-QICSS / Quebec Inter-University Centre for Social Statistics
  95. Chinese Canadian National Council
  96. Children’s Aid Society of Toronto
  97. Cities Centre – University of Toronto Research Institute
  98. Cityspaces Consulting Ltd.
  99. Citizens Engaging Democracy, Newmarket-Aurora
  100. City of Burnaby
  101. City of Brampton
  102. City of Calgary
  103. City of Charlottetown
  104. City of Edmonton
  105. City of Fredericton
  106. City of Greater Sudbury
  107. City of Kelowna
  108. City of Kitimat
  109. City of Langley
  110. City of Laval
  111. City of Mississauga
  112. City of North Vancouver
  113. City of Merritt
  114. City of Montreal
  115. City of Ottawa
  116. City of Red Deer
  117. City of Surrey
  118. City of Toronto
  119. City of Vancouver
  120. City of Vernon
  121. City of Victoria
  122. Collectif de bibliothécaires du Québec (Jo-Ann Belair, Annie Bérubé, Stéfano Biondo, Joë Bouchard,Chantal Beauregard, Pierre Carrier, Pierre Chicoine, Nancy Drolet, Alain Gendron, Catherine Jalbert, Guy Julien, Christian Lacroix, Dominique Lapierre, Marie-Denise Lavoie, Louise Leblanc, Sonia Léger, Véronique Paré, Normand Pelletier, Marcel Plourde, Gaston Quirion, Rose-Marie Racine-April et Chantal St-Louis)
  123. Co-operative Housing Federation of Canada / Fédération Canadienne des Coopératives de Logement
  124. Committee of Presidents of Statistical Societies
  125. Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse
  126. Commissariat aux langues officielles
  127. Community Development Halton (Ontario)
  128. Community Development Council Durham
  129. Community Foundations of Canada
  130. Community Social Planning Council of Greater Victoria
  131. Confédération des associations étudiantes de l’Université Laval (CADEUL)
  132. Conseil consultatif sur la condition de femme du Nouveau-Brunswick
  133. Concordia Student Union
  134. Conference Board of Canada
  135. Conference des Lecteurs et Principaux des University de Quebec / Conference of Rectors and Principals of Quebec Universities (Association of Universities in Quebec)
  136. Conférence régionale des élus (CRÉ) de Laval
  137. Conseil permanent de la jeunesse (CPJ)
  138. Conseil des agences servant les immigrants
  139. Conseil Québécois des Coopératives et des Municipalités
  140. Conservative MP James Rajotte
  141. Daily Bread Food Bank (Toronto)
  142. Davenport Perth Community Health Centre
  143. Département de démographie of Université de Montréal
  144. District of Nipissing Social Service Admin Board
  145. Doctors Nova Scotia
  146. Don Drummond; former chief economist of TD bank, former ADM of Finance
  147. Economic Development Association of British Columbia (EDABC)
  148. Edmonton Journal, Editorial
  149. Evangelical Fellowship of Canada / Alliance Évangélique du Canada
  150. Environics Analytics
  151. Fair Share Peel
  152. Family Service Association of Toronto
  153. Research, Evaluation and Planning
    Family Service Toronto
  154. Federation of Post-Secondary Educators of BC
  155. Fédération canadienne de démographie
  156. Fédération des associations étudiantes du Campus de l’Université de Montréal (FAÉCUM)
  157. Fédération des chambres de commerce du Quebec
  158. Féderation des Communautés Francophones et Acadiennes du Canada (FCFA)
  159. Fédération des travailleurs et travailleuses du Québec
  160. Federation of Canadian Municipalities / Fédération canadienne des municipalités
  161. Fédération étudiante universitaire du Québec (FEUQ)
  162. Fédération Québécoise des Professeurs et Professeures d’Universités
  163. Dr. Robin Fitzgerald, Research Fellow, Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance, Griffith University, Canadian Scholar Downunder
  164. Four Villages Community Health Centre
  165. Ivan Fellegi, Former Chief Statistician, Statistics Canada
  166. Tom Flanagan, University of Calgary
  167. French Language Services Commissioner of Ontario / commissaire aux services en français de l’Ontario
  168. Glendon School of International and Public Policy
  169. Globe and Mail Editorials
  170. Stephen Gordon, economist Université Laval
  171. Government of Nunavut
  172. Frank Graves, EKOS Research (polling)
  173. Greater Halifax Partnership
  174. Greater Victoria Community Indicators Network
  175. Green Party of Canada / Parti vert du Canada
  176. Grey County
  177. Halifax Chronicle-Herald, Editorial
  178. Halton, Region of
  179. Hamilton’s Settlement and Integration Services Organization
  180. Hamilton Roundtable for Poverty Reduction
  181. Hamilton Community Foundation
  182. Headwaters Communities in Action (HCIA)
  183. The Hill Times editorial
  184. Alex Himelfarb, former Clerk of Privy Council
  185. Imagine Canada
  186. Information and Communications Technology Council
  187. Institut de statistiques Quebec / Statistical Institute of Quebec
  188. Institute for Research on Public Policy
  189. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami / Association nationale Inuit (du Canada)
  190. JJ McCullough
  191. Kevin Milligan, economist at University of British Columbia
  192. Liberal Party of Canada / Parti Libéral du Canada
  193. Lumina Research Valuation and Advisory Services
  194. Maclean’s Magazine (Articles)
  195. Marketing Research and Intelligence Association (MRIA) / Association de la Recherche et de Intelligence Marketing (ARIM)
  196. Roger Martin, Rotman School of Management
  197. Martin Prosperity Institute
  198. Kelly McParland (editor of Full Comment, the National Post)
  199. Medical Health Officers Council of Saskatchewan
  200. Metcalf Foundation
  201. Metropolis British Columbia
  202. Metro Vancouver (AKA GVRD)
  203. Metro Vancouver Housing Committee
  204. Mike Moffatt
  205. Nanos Research (polling)
  206. National Council of Women of Canada (NCWC)
  207. National Post Editorial
  208. National Specialty Society for Community Medicine
  209. National Statistics Council (French Statement) / Association statistique du Canada
  210. Nature International Editorial
  211. New Democratic Party of Canada / Nouveau Parti Démocratique du Canada
  212. New Heights Community Health Centres
  213. North Bay Parry Sound District Health Unit
  214. North Western Ontario Municipal Association
  215. Oak Park Neighbourhood Centre
  216. Official Language Commissioner
  217. Ontario Chamber of Commerce
  218. Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants
  219. Ontario Council of University Libraries
  220. Ontario deputy finance minister Peter Wallace
  221. Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC)
  222. Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association (OPNHA)
  223. Ontario-Municipal Social Services Association (OMSSA)
  224. Ontario Professional Planners Institute
  225. Ontario Public School Boards Association
  226. Opportunities Waterloo Region
  227. Orillia Packet and Times (Editorial)
  228. Dr. Sylvia Ostry, Former Chief Statistician
  229. Ottawa Citizen Editorial
  230. PARC (Toronto)
  231. Peel, Regional Municipality
  232. Peel Children’s Aid / Aide à l’enfance région de Peel
  233. Peel Poverty Action Group (PPAG)
  234. Peterborough’s medical officer of health
  235. Pickard &Law Firm
  236. Pillar Nonprofit Network
  237. Planning Council of Cambridge and North Dumfries (Cambridge,Ont.)
  238. Blake Poland, Associate Professor, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
  239. Poverty Free Halton
  240. Valerie Preston, director of CERIS research centre on immigration and settlement issues York University
  241. Prentice Institute at University of Lethbridge
  242. Province of Manitoba
  243. Province of New Brunswick
  244. Province of Ontario
  245. Province of Ontario – Office of Francophone Affairs
  246. Province of Prince Edward Island
  247. Province of Quebec
  248. Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC)
  249. Quebec Community Groups Network
  250. Queer Ontario
  251. John Rafferty, MP
  252. Research Centre on Digital Inclusion / Centre de recherche et d’expérimentation sur l’inclusion numérique (CREIN)
  253. Regent Park Community Health Centre
  254. Regional Planning Commissioners of Ontario
  255. Registered Nurses Association of Ontario
  256. Richard Florida, University of Toronto
  257. Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario (RCCAO) / Alliance de la construction résidentielle et civile de l’Ontario
  258. Royal Society of Canada
  259. Rural Ontario Institute (ROI)
  260. St. Joseph’s Health Centre
  261. St. Stephen’s House
  262. Saskatchewan Students’ Union (USSU)
  263. Munir A. Sheikh, Former Chief Statistician of Canada
  264. Martin Simard,  laboratoire LERGA, Département des sciences humaines et CRDT, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
  265. Simcoe County
  266. Social Planning Council of Kitchener-Waterloo
  267. Social Planning Council of Sudbury
  268. Social Planning Network of Ontario
  269. Social Planning Toronto
  270. Social Planning Council of Winnipeg
  271. Social Policy in Ontario
  272. Société franco-manitobaine
  273. Société de l’Acadie du Nouveau-Brunswick
  274. South Riverdale Community Health Centre
  275. SPARC BC (Social Planning and Research Council of BC)
  276. StarPhoenix [Saskatoon ] Editorial
  277. Statistical Society of Canada
  278. Statistics Canada Advisory Committee
  279. Statistics Canada Advisory Committee on Demographic Statistics and Studies / Comité consultatif sur les études et les statistiques démographiques de Statistique Canada
  280. Sudbury Star, Editorial
  281. Surrey Board of Trade (BC)
  282. Syndicat des employés internationaux unis (SEIU)
  283. Table régionale des organismes communautaires autonomes en logement de Laval (TROCALL)
  284. Tasha Kheirridin
  285. Toronto Association for Business Economics
  286. Toronto Board of Trade
  287. Toronto Immigrant Employment Data Initiative (TIEDI)
  288. Toronto Public Health / Directeur de santé publique de Toronto
  289. Toronto Star Editorial
  290. Toronto Social Research and Data Consortium (30 health, community and multi-service social agencies)
  291. Toronto Women’s Housing Co-op
  292. Town of Caledon
  293. Town of Halton Hills
  294. Town of Milton
  295. Town of Smith Falls
  296. Transportation Association of Canada / Conseil du transport urbain du Canada
  297. Ukrainian Canadian Congress / Congrès Canadien Ukrainien
  298. United Church of Canada
  299. United Steelworkers
  300. United Way of Calgary
  301. United Way of Canada
  302. United Way of Kitchener-Waterloo and Area
  303. United Way of Greater Simcoe County
  304. United Way Toronto
  305. Université de Toronto
  306. Urban Futures
  307. Vancouver Board of Trade
  308. Volunteer Toronto
  309. Waterloo, Region of
  310. Wellesley Institute
  311. West Hill Community Services
  312. West Toronto Support Services
  313. WoodGreen Community Services
  314. Women’s Hands Community Health Centre
  315. York Community Services

I hear they are looking for a shepherd somewhere in the interior of B.C. to appear before the Committee to represent all ordinary Canadians.  Is this really the kind of government we deserve? I don’t think so.

List provided by: http://datalibre.ca/census-watch/

Posted in Community at August 19th, 2010. 1 Comment.

It used to be that Canadians believed in sacrificing a bit themselves to provide for the needs of others.  That’s the principle behind universal health care, after all. We all contribute to the costs even if some people make more use of the healthcare system than we do. We send money to poorer provinces (grudgingly – but we do it) so that access to important services is determined less by where in the country you live. We support a progressive taxation system so that those with greater means pay more to support the running of the country.  This has been the role and philosophy of Canadian governments since Confederation.

But now we have a national government that doesn’t believe in government.  We have a Prime Minister who declares that there is no such thing as a good tax. That means that government is essentially a necessary evil – not an instrument for the greater good.

Oliver Wendell Holmes, famously said that “Taxes are the price we pay for civilization”. And that was in a country that believes in weak national governments.  In a modern society, one of the responsibilities of government is ensuring that we have reliable information on which to base the decisions that governments and the private sector make.  Sometimes, this means forcing people to provide information that is very personal, so we take great pains to ensure that information on individuals is always protected.

Government makes us do many things that many people believe are personal.  If you want your child enrolled in school, the child must be vaccinated, whether you believe in vaccines or not. Children who ride bikes have to wear helmets whether their parents want them to or not. Canada Revenue wants to know your income whether you want to tell them or not.  Even if we don’t agree with what government decides we should do, the vast majority of us still do it.

So, now in Canada, some people – apparently those who vote for parties that don’t believe in government – have expressed their strong belief that government is invading their privacy and demanding personal information in the long-form census.  Not a lot of people – but some people.  And now the government that doesn’t believe in government intends to eliminate the socio-demographic data that helps government, business, charities, universities, and others make decisions that benefit Canadians nationally, provincially, municipally, and in your neighbourhood – probably even you.

If you value good information for decision-making by government, business, charities, and more, tell that to your M.P. no matter which party.  This one is worth fighting for.

Posted in Community at July 20th, 2010. No Comments.

In the last week, the Government of Canada has withdrawn funding from about a dozen women’s organizations and the Toronto Pride parade.  You’d have to be a cabbage to not know that this isn’t about cost-cutting to reduce the deficit.  Nor is it about spreading money around to more groups.  It’s nothing more than a policy bribe to keep the conservative right’s support for the Harper government. 

Not that Harper doesn’t believe in these things – he does.  But he can’t accomplish significant cutting of services for women, the GLBT community, and other “left” issues until he has a majority.  And to win a majority, he has to keep the Christian Right happy without losing conservative-leaners.  So, alienating women who wouldn’t vote Conservative anyway, and the GLBT community who feels likewise, loses him nothing, but keeps the Right close.

Some of us continue to believe that the role of government is to meet the needs of the public writ large.  The Harpies believe that the role of the government is to operate according to a particular Christian set of beliefs.  There’s nothing wrong with holding a particular set of religious beliefs.  But when you try to foist them on the public at large you move from governing in a public state to governing in a religious state. 

Canadians in general object when foreign countries are run according to the dictates of a fundamental religious theology, and use that theology to disenfranchise women and minorities.  What makes Harpie think it will turn out any different here?

This is not the government we deserve.

Posted in Community at May 9th, 2010. No Comments.

Riffing on the “man bites dog” theme, we now have “women’s rights activist bites women’s rights advocates”.  Conservative Senator Nancy Ruth told activists to “shut the fuck up” and stop complaining about the Prime Minister’s stand forbidding funding for abortion in his maternal and child health initiative for the developing world.  It seems she thought this would be helpful advice because she wanted to protect the organizations meeting on this subject in Ottawa from losing federal funding.  In the Tory world dissenter equals enemy, and we can’t have that, can we?

We already know what the Harper government does to funded groups it that don’t follow the Conservative philosoply – they de-fund them.  Women’s groups have suffered, the Court Challenge program, serving mainly minorities and the poor was de-funded, even Volunteer Canada was cut.  God forbid we would want to exercise free speech in Canada.

Is this the government we deserve?

Posted in Community at May 4th, 2010. No Comments.

The Conservatives have come out swinging against the CBC alleging a liberal bias in Canada’s official network.  Ignoring the fact that CBC criticism of the Conservative Party may have something to do with its, and its members’ own behaviour, Tory spin-doctors point to the CBC pollster and his description of how Canadians feel about the various parties.  Considering that the Conservatives have been dealing with issues such as prorogation, their refusal to accede to Parliament’s demand for Afghan prisoner documents, their Ministers who go ballistic – one of whom is tossed from the party and under investigation by the RCMP, and a former caucus chair who has been found to be lying to a Parliamentary Committee, is it surprising that the CBC’s coverage of the government hasn’t been laudatory of late? 

Of course, to the paranoid PM and his group of PMO sycophants any negative coverage by the mother network must be evidence of a liberal bias.  What they fail to understand, is the country as a whole has a liberal bias.  It’s the Conservatives who are out of step. 

The Conservative Party received 38% of the votes cast in the 2008 election.  The political philosophies of the four other parties are all left of the Conservative Party. Harper chooses to operate like a majority Prime Minister, preferring to pretend that his party represents the interests of all Canadians.  The truth of the matter is that the Conservatives are the fringe party in Canada.  The other parties, representing 62% of the voting population, are one form or another of centre-to-left.  The CBC and the Canadians they poll aren’t biased – it’s the Conservatives who are biased – to the right.

Posted in Community at April 29th, 2010. No Comments.

Building on the “dumb on crime” agenda of our federal government, the Parliamentary Budget Officer, Kevin Page, has put a price tag of up to $10 billion on just one part of the agenda – revoking the two-for-one practice in sentencing.  Longer sentences will cost even more.  The two-for-one practice counts two days for every day spent in custody before and during one’s trial.  This was put in place originally to recognize that the pre-sentencing facilities are over-crowded and provide little for the prisoner to do.  They are considered to be harsher than actual prison, so double credit was given for the length of incarceration there.

The legislation to eliminate the provision for most prisoners means that extra time will be spent in prison following sentencing.  This drives up the cost for new prison facilities for the additional prisoners, as well as the daily cost of keeping them there.

The Feds say they haven’t calculated the cost, but it’s not likely to cost more than $90 million at most.  The Budget Officer puts it at up to ten times as much.  Luckily for the federal government, most of that time is spent in provincial facilities, not federal ones, so the cost will be borne by the provinces – not the federal budget.  How handy. 

This isn’t the government we deserve.

On a brighter note, House of Commons Speaker Peter Millikin has ruled that Parliament has every right to demand all the un-redacted documents pertaining to prisoners in Afghanistan.  Score one for the power of Parliament over that of the Prime Minister.  We’ll see whether Harper decides to accede to the ruling or challenge it in court.  Any guesses? Chalk one up for the government we deserve – at least for now.

Posted in Community at April 28th, 2010. No Comments.

In launching National Victims of Crime Awareness Week yesterday the Prime Minister said: “Our Government has always made the protection of law-abiding Canadians one of our very top priorities.”  Sure.  His “tough on crime” legislation died on the order paper twice – once from each prorogation.  Experts have labeled the “crime fighting” package “dumb on crime”.  It fails to take into account that violent crime has been decreasing across Canada for many years.  It fails to take into account that government research both in Canada and the U.S. concludes that longer sentences increase recidivism.  It fails to show through any empirical research that the elements of the strategy will work.  But, according to the government, it’s what the people want.  Gee, the people want better environmental legislation, and we’re not getting that.  It’s not what the people want – it’s what the Conservative core want, and the government wants to pass legislation for the good of the party, not for the good of the country. 

That’s not the government we deserve.

Posted in Community at April 27th, 2010. No Comments.

Within the next year or so Ontarians will be going to the polls three times.  For municipal elections this fall, provincial elections in 2011, and probably a federal election within the next year.  So this is a good a time as any to begin a discussion about the current state and the future of civil society in Canada.  “Civil society” is that space between government, business, and family in which both individually and collectively we determine the kind of society we want, and how to achieve that goal.  Civil society assumes that we take some kind of action to create our desired future.  Without that action, the population is simply the captive of government and market forces.

At its most basic, civil society can be measured by voter turnout.  While a majority of eligible voters still turn out for federal elections (58.8% in 2008), by the time we work our way down to the municipal level, turnout is often below 30% (28.7% in Waterloo in 2006).  The turnout in Ontario’s 2007 election was 52.6% – a record low. 

It’s not like government doesn’t matter – it controls much of how we live and relate to each other.  So, what’s going on?

Over the next few months, this series will attempt to highlight some of the more significant issues facing governments and the public – both good and bad.  If we think about what’s happening, maybe we can eventually do something about it.

Our society works better when people are engaged.  When we sleep through public life we miss out on the opportunity to make important choices.  We complain about government, but don’t vote.  We criticize government decisions, but don’t take the opportunity to have input. 

So, let’s start with a good issue.  Ontario has launched a process to develop a partnership with the nonprofit sector. The Province and the Ontario Trillium Foundation will be conducting province-wide discussions.  Get out. Have your input.  Become engaged.

Posted in Community at April 26th, 2010. No Comments.

Recently published research by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities puts Waterloo Region’s public transit users pretty much at the bottom of the income heap.  Based on 2006 incomes, the average income of Grand River Transit riders was $19,000.  The Canadian average was $34,500.  That’s a huge gap.  Now, the Canadian average is partly skewed by large urban centres where transit riding is much more egalitarian.  However, we still do terribly when we look at Canada as a whole.

This might be of limited concern but for the fact that the Region wants to spend a few hundred million dollars building a rapid transit line between Waterloo and Cambridge.  The theory is that the line will attract higher density along the urban core – creating more business and higher density residential living in that area .  Those residents would use the public transit.  This fits into the Province’s requirements for higher density urban cores to control urban sprawl.  It might work if there was a culture of transit use by a broad spectrum of residents in the Region, but right now, that’s just not so. 

Commute times for Waterloo Region’s workers is already short.  The median commuting distance for the Region’s workers in 2006 was under 6 kilometres.  Round trip! 

For rapid transit to be viable, we need lots more people who work far from where they live, but still live fairly close to the urban core of the three cities.  How likely is that?

Posted in Community at April 19th, 2010. No Comments.